The site contains real stories about real people who have been harmed by “tort reform.” And it demonstrates how site visitors could easily find themselves victims themselves. It engages people with a full-time social media commitment and blogs from outside organizations dedicated to civil justice. And it provides all the tools to motivate people to take action right from the site, from contacting their members of Congress to signing petitions.
Category: Catastrophic Injury
“This bipartisan legislation is a practical solution that will streamline the Medicare Secondary Payer system to ensure that seniors and persons with disabilities get timely assistance and taxpayers are repaid millions of dollars every year.”
“This legislation is a big step forward and is the result of senior advocates, the legal community and the business community coming together to work out a common sense solution.”
“There is still work to be done. To ensure this legislation has the most impact, [the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] CMS must eliminate confusion and uncertainty by providing clear, efficient and definitive information to seniors.”
Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP):
• The MSP process ensures Medicare is reimbursed for medical bills that are the responsibility of another party – such as an insurer or negligent party.
• A senior or person with disabilities who has been injured, and later obtains recourse through the legal system, often cannot access their settlement until Medicare is reimbursed for all medical costs.
• The current MSP system is inefficient and slow to return dollars to the Medicare Trust Fund, which is funded by tax payer money.
• It can take years for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to report reimbursement amounts to beneficiaries and CMS can seek multiple reimbursement amounts over time, providing further delay and uncertainty.
The SMART Act will:
• Require CMS to maintain a secure web portal to access claims and reimbursement amounts in a timely fashion.
o CMS must upload care payments they disperse within 15 days with the required information about the payment.
• Streamline the process of obtaining reimbursement amounts.
o Medicare beneficiaries must notify CMS they are anticipating a settlement no more than 120 days beforehand.
o CMS then has 65 days to ensure the web portal is up-to-date, but may request an additional 30 days, if needed.
o Reimbursement amounts are reliable if downloaded from the web portal within three days of settlement.
• Provide a process and timeline for discrepancies and appeals.
o Medicare beneficiaries can provide documentation for discrepancies on the web portal to CMS.
o CMS has 11 days to respond to discrepancies.
o If CMS does not respond in 11 days, the amount calculated by the beneficiary is the correct amount.
o An additional appeal process must be established by CMS for reimbursements it attempts to collect from insurance plans.
• Create a threshold for collecting any payment amounts by CMS that are below the cost it incurs to collect an average claim.
• Readjust the penalty for reporting errors by insurers based on the violation.
• Ensure greater privacy for beneficiaries by no longer requiring use of full social security or health id claim numbers.
• Create a three year limit for CMS to seek any repayments beginning from when they were informed of an anticipated settlement.
We hear a lot about “Judicial hellhole” labels, referring to geographic areas of our country in which tort reformers want to make sweeping changes to defeat the rights of innocent people who have suffered the most serious injuries as a result of someone else’s negligence. These labels are pure propaganda, and are shamelessly published and repeated by media which are careless (to put it kindly) about verifying the accuracy of the outrageous claims made by corporate, medical, hospital and insurance interests. They would like to nothing more than to minimize their own financial exposure and accountability by blaming our jury system, and fair-minded people like you who sit on those juries, for large verdicts and settlements. In fact, our judicial system was created to level the playing field of ordinary people and small businesses who had been at the mercy of corporate irresponsibility. Can you spell ENRON? BP? Do they exude a sense of responsibility? Of a sensitivity to those they’ve harmed? The answer is clear… Instead of standing for corporate and individual responsibility, big business, the insurance and medical industries stand together to crush the rights of individuals who have been harmed by wrongdoers.
The American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) is dedicated to help corporations evade responsibility for wrongdoing by undermining the civil justice system. Each year at this time ATRA issues an update to its inflammatorily titled “Judicial Hellholes” report, employing junk research to stoke public fear and foster misperception about how the legal system works. This report, like so many in the past, contains factual inaccuracies which further undermine the validity of their so-called “rankings”.
Even the Illinois Civil Justice League, which is closely allied with ATRA, disagrees with the placement of Madison County on the judicial hellhole list and has stated that Madison County and its judicial leadership have taken major steps toward improvement of its judicial system and is not deserving of the “hellhole” title.
Oftentimes, citizens can only get a fair shake by taking their grievances to court, particularly when taking on such powerful special interests. No entity, government official or business should be permitted to use its power to infringe upon the right of citizens to have their day in court.
The fact is that corporations don’t fear frivolous lawsuits. If they are truly frivolous, they are lost. They DO fear MERITORIOUS cases… actions brought by citizens against corporations producing unsafe products, polluting air and water, swindling their employees, or otherwise acting irresponsibly. They DO fear actions against doctors and hospitals who have neglected reasonable standards of practice and maimed and killed innocent patients by their neglect. Every measure that tort reformers suggest has been intended to make it harder and harder, and more and more expensive, for people to bring their meritorious cases to court. The most common goal of tort reformers is to put artificial limits on the amount of damages that can be recovered in cases where it has been proven that the damages sought to be recovered by the injured plaintiff WAS caused by the defendant’s neglect! They don’t care what the evidence shows, or what YOU believe is fair for that individual case.
The real “judicial hellhole” is the one that ATRA and its allies wish to create: a court system in which regular citizens have no prospects for fair treatment and justice because their hard-won rights have been stripped away by powerful special interests.